|
2025-1639
| 1 | 1. | Motion | Council considers an appeal of the Snohomish County Hearing Examiner’s April 30, 2025, Decision in the case of Eastview Village 22-113955 SPA, 22-114101 SPA, 22-117447 SPA, 22-117395 PSD, 22-117398 PSD/SPA, 22-117404 PSD, 24-113099 SPA located at 8915 Cathcart Way, Snohomish, Washington, 98296, of 1,311 dwelling units and 61,000 sq. ft. of commercial space consisting of Planned Residential Development subdivision, Planned Residential Development official site plan, preliminary subdivision, Urban Residential Design Standards administrative site plan, and Single-Family Detached Unit site plan approved subject to conditions | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
2025-2179
| 1 | | Motion | ORAL MOTION
In the Matter of the Eastview Village Closed Record Appeal, Vice-Chair Dunn made a motion as follows:
1. The Council does not have jurisdiction over professional conflict of interest issues regarding legal counsel for the applicant and will not consider conflict issues.
2. Deborah Wetzel may speak as a representative of appellants as a group.
3. As representative of appellants as a group, Deborah Wetzel is not limited to arguing issues raised in her motion for reconsideration.
4. Issues T and U are unique to Marshland Flood Control District and appellants lack standing to raise them. Therefore, Issues T and U are summarily dismissed.
5. The Council does not have jurisdiction over SEPA exemption determinations. Therefore, Issue B is dismissed.
6. Any Party of Record that does not argue during the Appellants’ case in chief may argue for 3 minutes each at the closed record hearing. However, Parties of Record that are also Appellants should avoid repeating arguments made during Appellants’ argument in chief. Parties of Record are reminded that the clo | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|